Who Owns Neil Young’S Music Catalog12 min read

Reading Time: 8 minutes

Many people consider Neil Young to be one of the most important singer-songwriters of all time. Over the course of his long and prolific career, Young has released dozens of albums and sold millions of records. He has also written, recorded, and performed songs for other artists, including Buffalo Springfield and Crosby, Stills, Nash, and Young.

Given Young’s stature in the music world, it’s no surprise that his music catalog is a prized commodity. In fact, the question of who owns Neil Young’s music catalog has been the subject of much debate and litigation over the years.

Initially, Young’s music was owned by his record labels, including Reprise Records and Geffen Records. However, in 2000, Young formed his own company, Vapor Trails, to manage his music rights. This created a bit of a conflict, as Young’s former record labels claimed that Vapor Trails was in breach of contract.

A lengthy legal battle ensued, with the courts ultimately ruling in favor of Young and Vapor Trails. This decision gave Young complete control over his music catalog, including the right to license his music to other labels and artists.

Since then, Young has continued to release new music and tour extensively. His music catalog is now one of the most valuable in the music industry, and is estimated to be worth millions of dollars.

Who owns the rights to Neil Young’s music?

Since the early days of his career, Neil Young has been a prolific artist, releasing dozens of albums and singles. His music has been enjoyed by millions of people around the world, and his songs have been covered by numerous artists.

However, who owns the rights to Neil Young’s music? This is a question that has been asked many times over the years, and there is no definitive answer.

Generally, the rights to a song belong to the songwriter, and in most cases, the songwriter is the person who owns the copyright. This is not always the case, however, and there are a number of factors that can affect who owns the rights to a song.

In the case of Neil Young, his songwriting credits are often shared with his bandmates or other collaborators. This can make it difficult to determine who actually owns the rights to a particular song.

Furthermore, the rights to a song can be transferred or licensed to other parties, and this can also be difficult to track down.

There have been several cases in which the rights to Neil Young’s music have been disputed, and it can be difficult to determine who actually owns the rights to his songs.

In the end, it is likely that the answer to this question is not something that can be easily determined. There are simply too many variables involved. However, Neil Young’s music is enjoyed by millions of people around the world, and it is likely that whoever owns the rights to his music is doing very well financially.

Does Hipgnosis own Neil Young’s music?

There is no definitive answer to whether Hipgnosis owns Neil Young’s music, as the situation is quite complex. It is generally agreed that Hipgnosis does own the rights to some of Young’s music, but it is not clear how much or which specific songs are included in this.

Hipgnosis was a music production company founded in the late 1960s by Storm Thorgerson and Peter Christopherson. The company was responsible for some of the most iconic album covers of the era, including those for Pink Floyd’s "The Dark Side of the Moon" and Led Zeppelin’s "Led Zeppelin IV".

In the early 1970s, Hipgnosis began working with Neil Young on the production of his albums "Harvest" and "Harvest Moon". It is generally agreed that Hipgnosis owns the rights to these albums, as well as to the songs "Heart of Gold" and "Old Man".

However, the situation is not as clear with regard to later albums such as "After the Gold Rush" and "Harvest". While it is generally agreed that Hipgnosis owns the rights to the songs "Heart of Gold" and "Old Man", it is not known whether they also own the rights to the other songs on these albums.

This uncertainty is due to a lawsuit that was filed by Young in the early 1990s. In this lawsuit, Young claimed that he had never signed a contract with Hipgnosis, and that they therefore did not own the rights to his music. The case went to trial, but the verdict was never released due to a settlement that was reached between the two parties.

As a result, it is not clear how much or which specific songs Hipgnosis actually owns the rights to. However, it is generally agreed that they do own the rights to some of Young’s music, including the albums "Harvest" and "Harvest Moon".

How much of Neil Young’s music does he own?

It’s no secret that Neil Young is a prolific musician. He’s released dozens of albums in his career, both with and without his band Crazy Horse. But how much of that music does he actually own?

Back in the 1970s, Young signed a contract with his record label that gave the company the rights to his music in perpetuity. In other words, the label could keep releasing and re-releasing his albums long after he died.

More recently, Young has been trying to renegotiate that contract. In 2012, he announced that he was suing his label to regain the rights to his music. However, the suit was eventually settled out of court, and the details of the agreement were never released.

So, we still don’t know exactly how much of Neil Young’s music he owns. But it’s safe to say that he doesn’t have complete control over his back catalogue.

Who owns hipgnosis songs Fund Ltd?

Who owns hipgnosis songs Fund Ltd?

Hipgnosis Songs Fund Ltd is a company registered in the Cayman Islands. It was founded in 2013 by former Pink Floyd members David Gilmour and Roger Waters, and their manager Steve O’Rourke. The company owns the copyright to many classic Pink Floyd songs, including "Money", "Wish You Were Here", and "The Wall".

The company is currently locked in a legal battle with Pink Floyd’s record company, EMI, over the ownership of the songs. EMI has claimed that the company is invalid, and that the Pink Floyd songs should belong to the record company. Hipgnosis Songs Fund Ltd has responded by filing a lawsuit against EMI.

The outcome of the lawsuit is still pending.

Who owns Neil music?

Since the inception of rock and roll, the question of who owns the music has been a hot topic. This is especially true in the case of Neil Young, one of the most influential and well-known artists of the genre.

There is no one easy answer to the question of who owns Neil Young’s music. The answer depends on a variety of factors, including the specific song or album in question, the recording and publishing rights involved, and the arrangements made between Young and his various collaborators.

In general, however, Young retains the rights to his own music, even if he has collaborated with other artists in the creation of a song or album. This is due to the fact that, under US copyright law, the author of a song is always considered to be the owner of the copyright in that song.

This applies even in the case of joint authorship, where two or more people have contributed to the creation of a work. In such cases, each author is typically considered to own an equal share of the copyright in the work.

This is not always the case, however, and there are a number of exceptions to the general rule that the author owns the copyright in a song. One of these exceptions is in the case of a work made for hire, where the copyright is owned by the person or entity that commissioned the work.

Another exception is in the case of a transfer of copyright ownership, where the copyright is sold, leased, or otherwise transferred to another party. This can be done through a written agreement or, in some cases, through an oral agreement.

In the case of Neil Young, his music has been the subject of a number of copyright disputes over the years. One of the most high-profile of these disputes was the lawsuit between Young and his former bandmate David Crosby, which was settled out of court in 1985.

The dispute arose out of the fact that Crosby had written a song called "Marrakesh Express" for the Young-led band Buffalo Springfield. Young claimed that he had written the song with Crosby and that, as a result, he was the rightful owner of the copyright.

Crosby, however, claimed that Young had only contributed to the song’s melody and that he was the true author of the song. The dispute was eventually settled out of court, with both parties releasing a joint statement saying that "each retains his respective copyrights in the songs."

While the details of who owns Neil Young’s music can be complicated, in general, Young retains the rights to his songs, even if he has collaborated with other artists in their creation. This is due to the fact that, under US copyright law, the author of a song is always considered to be the owner of the copyright in that song.

Who owns Neil Young’s music Wikipedia?

Since the early days of his career, Neil Young has been fiercely independent when it comes to his music. He has never been shy about criticizing the music industry and has always been adamant about owning and controlling his own work. This attitude has led to some interesting legal battles over the years, most notably his ongoing dispute with his former record label, Geffen Records.

In the early days of his career, Young was signed to Geffen Records. However, he soon grew frustrated with the label’s insistence on controlling his work and releasing albums that he felt were not true to his vision. As a result, he left Geffen in the early 1990s and started his own label, Vapor Records.

Since then, Young has continued to release music independently, without the help of a major record label. In fact, he has even released albums online, directly to his fans, bypassing the traditional music industry altogether.

This independent approach has always been a central part of Young’s music career and he has never been shy about criticizing the music industry. In a 2009 interview with The Guardian, he had this to say about the industry:

"The music business is a cruel and shallow money trench, a long plastic hallway where thieves and pimps run free, and good men die like dogs. There’s also a negative side."

Clearly, Young has never been a fan of the music industry and has always been adamant about controlling his own work. This attitude has led to some interesting legal battles over the years, most notably his ongoing dispute with his former record label, Geffen Records.

In the early days of his career, Young was signed to Geffen Records. However, he soon grew frustrated with the label’s insistence on controlling his work and releasing albums that he felt were not true to his vision. As a result, he left Geffen in the early 1990s and started his own label, Vapor Records.

Since then, Young has continued to release music independently, without the help of a major record label. In fact, he has even released albums online, directly to his fans, bypassing the traditional music industry altogether.

This independent approach has always been a central part of Young’s music career and he has never been shy about criticizing the music industry. In a 2009 interview with The Guardian, he had this to say about the industry:

"The music business is a cruel and shallow money trench, a long plastic hallway where thieves and pimps run free, and good men die like dogs. There’s also a negative side."

Clearly, Young has never been a fan of the music industry and has always been adamant about controlling his own work. This attitude has led to some interesting legal battles over the years, most notably his ongoing dispute with his former record label, Geffen Records.

In the early days of his career, Young was signed to Geffen Records. However, he soon grew frustrated with the label’s insistence on controlling his work and releasing albums that he felt were not true to his vision. As a result, he left Geffen in the early 1990s and started his own label, Vapor Records.

Since then, Young has continued to release music independently, without the help of a major record label. In fact, he has even released albums online, directly to his fans, bypassing the traditional music industry altogether.

This independent approach has always been a central part of Young’s music career and he has never been shy about criticizing the music industry. In a 2009 interview with The Guardian, he had this to say about the industry:

"The music business is a cruel and shallow money trench, a long plastic

How much did Bruce Springsteen sell his music Catalogue for?

In an auction at Sotheby’s in New York, Bruce Springsteen’s music catalogue was sold for a total of $18 million. This includes the rights to songs such as "Born to Run" and "Thunder Road".

The auction was a part of Springsteen’s divorce settlement from his wife Patti Scialfa. Springsteen will keep the publishing rights to his songs, but the copyrights to the recordings will be split between him and his ex-wife.

The $18 million was split between Sotheby’s and the law firm that represented Springsteen in the divorce.